As the impeachment circus continues to unfold, it becomes plainly obvious that the National Security Council is playing a key role in the Democrats' effort to remove President Trump. The question has to be asked. If the NSC, or to be fair, at least a small cabal within it, has been working in opposition to the president this entire time, doesn't it start to make sense as to why the deep state set General Flynn up when Trump first appointed him to be his National Security Advisor?
If General Flynn was truly the enemy of the deep state we have been told he was, it makes perfect sense. He would have been the enforcer put in place to weed out all the snakes we've now come to realize have been working against POTUS during his first term. Taking him out was critical for the bad actors to keep a thread on their control of the White House.
We are going to lay out a series of facts here, along with links to articles from around the web that will give some context to what we're saying here.
So here goes...
Three of Schiff's key witnesses so far have been current or former NSC officials: Tim Morrison, Fiona Hill, and Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman.
The supposed whistleblower himself, was a former member of the NSC, and may have even played a central role in the original Russia hoax. You can read about that here:
From that article, you can see Sperry alleges the whistleblower was even removed from the NSC for leaking to the media. Any chance he played a part in leaking the 2017 calls between President Trump and Australia and Mexico that prompted the placing of all call transcripts thereafter on a secure location to protect from leaks? (something now being used as evidence the president is "hiding something"... funny how that works)
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, one of Schiff's key witnesses, is a current official on the NSC. Despite not wearing it to work every day, he showed up to both of his impeachment hearings adorned in his military attire, a signal to the media that he must be protected from all scrutiny, as a decorated war hero- a luxury that wasn't afforded to General Flynn.
It's interesting that when Republicans started questioning Vindman on who he spoke to about the July 25 phone call between President Trump and President Zelensky, Adam Schiff and other Democrats interrupted in order to protect the "whistleblower." So the question must be asked. Did Vindman leak to the whistleblower? You can read about that and watch the video of the portion where Jim Jordan starts prodding for answers here:
You can read more about why some believe Vindman leaked to the whistleblower here:
Seditious Conspiracy / Sketchy Witness – Schiff Blocks Questioning of NSC Staffer Alexander Vindman to Protect Him from Legal Exposure…
It's also interesting that Schiff claims to not know who the whistleblower is, but he or his staff has already been outed as having met with the individual:
Vindman also expressed his distaste for President Trump's foreign policy... which is odd because the president sets foreign policy, not the NSC. You can read about that here:
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’ - Daily Caller
Alexander Vindman Was ‘Troubled’ by Trump’s Attempt to ‘Subvert U.S. Foreign Policy’ and That’s a Very Big Problem - Red State
An follow Lt. Col. named Jim Hickman took to Twitter to excoriate Lt. Col. Vindman's behavior during his experiences working alongside him. Hickman was of course attacked by the MSM (I thought you couldn't smear military personnel?). You can read about that here:
Retired Army Officer Remembers Lt. Col. Vindman as Partisan Democrat Who Ridiculed America - AM Greatness
Additionally, Adam Schiff has come under fire for actually hiring two former members of the NSC to work on his staff... during the impeachment proceedings... that stem from allegations made by current and former NSC staff. Now why would he do that? You can read about that here:
CNN's characterization of it is especially hysterical:
So, given all of the NSC's involvement in subverting the president's foreign policy agenda, and now testifying against him in Adam Schiff's impeachment charade, how do we connect General Michael Flynn?
Recall that General Flynn was Donald Trump's first choice as National Security Advisor, or the boss of the NSC.
General Flynn was railroaded into a guilty plea by the special counsel, who we now know was investigating a complete lie for 2 years in an apparent cover operation for spying malfeasance during the 2016 election and beyond.
So here's what we have on Flynn...
James Comey bragged about entrapping Flynn at the White House in the early days of the administration, saying he thought he could get away with sending a couple agents over and telling Flynn he needed no lawyers.
But the targeting of Flynn began long before that, when the decorated general became a vocal opponent of the Iran Nuclear Deal. The Obama Admin couldn't have one of their generals speaking out against the administration's marquee foreign policy achievement. You can read about that here:
You can also read about how the Obama Admin aimed to fool the public into supporting the deal. Think Flynn knew this?
The entrapment of General Flynn seems to begin during an RT event where, conveniently, outed FBI informant and central Russiagate/Spygate spy Stefan Halper was present. You can read about that here:
FBI Informant Stefan Halper Accused Of Making ‘False’ And ‘Absurd’ Allegations About Russian Infiltration At Cambridge - Daily Caller
It's also worth noting that General Flynn's lawyer, Sidney Powell, in defense of her client, has requested data from the phones of Joseph Mifsud, which she alleges the DOJ now has possession of. This is significant because Mifsud, if you recall, was the "Maltese professor" we were told was really a Russian asset, that told Trump Campaign staffer George Papadapoulos that Russia had Hillary's emails. This is the event that supposedly kicked off the Russia investigation (a lie, but that's another story for another time). You can read about Mifsud's phones and why Powell connects Mifsud with the entrapment of Flynn here:
Wait, What… DOJ Has Possession of Joseph Mifsud Cell Phones (Blackberries)?… - The Conservative Treehouse
Jumping back to Flynn's guilty plea, which was for lying to federal agents in that meeting Comey bragged about setting up. The funny thing? Agents didn't think Flynn even lied. You can read about that here:
Faced with the reality that General Flynn didn't lie, and the necessity to prove he did in order to preserve their credibility, prosecutors schemed up a way to entangle General Flynn's son, Mike Flynn Jr., his business partners, and Flynn himself in a FARA violation charge, and threatened action against his son if General Flynn didn't play ball. You can read about that, and how it fell apart here:
Smart Move – Flynn Lawyer Tells Judge Motive Behind Why Flynn Took Guilty Plea…- The Conservative Treehouse
There are so many more aspects to the Flynn story that it's hard to compile them all here in this one post. Luckily, a few of our favorite outlets have done substantive and extensive reporting on the entire saga, from his opposition to Obama's Iran Deal, to the early set up of Flynn with a supposed "Russian Spy," to the WH meeting Comey set up, to his guilty plea, and now the systematic dismantling of the entire and entrapment scheme, including the government's withholding of exculpatory Brady material, by his new lawyer, Sidney Powell.
You can read all of The Federalist reporting on it here: Flynn Articles - The Federalist
And you can read all of The Conservative Treehouse reporting on it here: Flynn Articles